6207ENG/7407ENG Environmental Management Systems Assessment Answers

School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University
6207ENG/7407ENG Environmental Management Systems T2/2020.
Assignment weight: 25%.
Due date: 2:00 PM, 21/09/2020
Assessment item: Assignment
Your task are as follow:
1- Choose 1 topic from the listed topics here. Other topic are NOT allowed, ZERO mark will be awarded for external topics.
2- Set forward a statement or hypothesis (make sure to state your stand; i.e., agree or disagree, support or do not support, true or false, …etc, do not sit on the fence)
3- Research a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 10 journal papers directly relevant to the topic to support your position.
4- Write a paper (1500 words max including in-text references and list of references) to support your position (hypothesis)
5- The paper should have the following:
a. Title (clearly reflect the content of the paper)
b. A summary (150 words maximum)
c. Main body (which can contain subsections). The main body must state the background, introduce the topic, and clearly state the hypothesis/statement. Then, present arguments/discussion to support the statement. Each paragraph should contain 1 idea. Support your argument/discussion with references to the literature (the 7-10 papers you read in task 3).
d. A conclusion (150 words maximum). The conclusion must be supported by the discussion.
6- Use Harvard or APA style referencing. The reference list must only contain the references cited in the body of the assignment.
7- Submit your work online on L@G course website (Turnitin).
Note: All submissions will undergo originality assessment (text matching). Before you submit, make sure to check the originality of your work.
Hire Assignment Writers
Note: the lecturer will not provide feedback on drafts.
Topics:
1- Can environmental management systems be used to manage the spread of COVID19 virus?
2- Use of Environmental Management Systems for sustainable management of hospital waste.
3- Environmental Management Systems adoption in small organisations.
4- ISO14001 is more successfully implemented when the organisation is certified to ISO9000.
5- To achieve meaningful results, the Environmental Management System must be certified.
6- Life cycle assessment of the organisation’s services/products is necessary to apply an effective environmental management systems.
7- Sustainable practices can be achieved through environmental management systems.
Course convenor: Ali El Hanandeh v. 7/7/2020
Marking criteria
Criteria Unsatisfactory (0-49)
Satisfactory (50- 65)
Good (65-75) Very good (75- 100)
C1. Topic selected from the list given in the assignment 0 1 1 1
C2. Title (5%) Does not reflect the content and/or misleading and/or ambiguous.
Reasonably reflects the content but very long and/or over promising. Reflects the content but is not concise Concise and clearly reflects the content
C3. Summary (10%)
Summary not provided and/or does not provide meaningful summary of the content. Provides a general overview of the content but does not state the stand of the author in relation to the topic. Does not provide key findings and possible implications of the work. Provides a reasonable overview of the content. It states the stand of the author and key findings but is very brief or very lengthy (>150 words). It does not clearly state the implications of the findings. Provides a clear overview of the content. It states the stand of the
author and key findings and is within the specified length (<=150 words). It clearly state the implications of the findings.
C4. Background and introduction (15%)
No background provided. Statement of position not provided or not decisive (sitting on the fence). The topic is placed in context, statement of position is clear. However, the introduction lacks coherence or poorly organised and does not lead smoothly to the statement of position. Statements are often not supported by evidence. The topic is placed in context, statement of position is clear. However, the introduction is not concise and some evidence of confusion are present. Use overgeneralised statements and some statementsare not supported by evidence or references. The topic is placed in context, statement of position is clear. The introduction is concise, and statements are supported by evidence or references.
C5. Discussion (40%)
Irrelevant to the topic or use of general statements. Lack of evidence. Author’s opinion/voice is not heard. Some discussion is presented. But, over reliant on direct quotes. Poor support of discussion. Author’s voice is Discussion is logical and coherent. However, use of direct quotes. Author’s opinion/voice is present but at High quality discussion is presented. Discussion is logical and coherent. Appropriate use of references and occasionally present. times does not lead to clear conclusion. direct quotes. Author’s opinion/voice is present and logically leads to clear conclusion supported by evidence.
C6. Conclusion (10%)
Not provided or not supported by the discussion or generic. Conclusion is provided but lengthy or too brief for clarity. Partially supported by the discussion but tend to contain generic statement rather than specific conclusions. Conclusion is supported by the discussion but lengthy (>150 words). Conclusion is concise and supported by the discussion.
C7. Language and word limit (10%) Written in poor English language or use of none academic language standard. Contains several grammatical and spelling mistakes that distracts from the general meaning. Exceed the word limit (>1500 words) Written in good English language and use of proper academic language. May contain grammatical and/or spelling errors. At times the meaning are not clear. Written in good English language and uses proper academic language. Few grammatical and/or spelling mistakes which do not distract from the general meaning. Written in professional English standard. Proper use of the language.
C8. References (10%)
References are not peer reviewed journal articles and/or not directly relevant to the topic and/or more than 10 references or less than 7 references are used; AND/or incorrect referencing style used or references not cited in text and/or 7-10 relevant peer reviewed journal articles are cited. Some errors in the referencing style and/or inappropriate citations and referencing. Some errors or missing citations. Some mistakes in the referencing style may occur but generally, sufficient 7-10 relevant peer reviewed journal articles are appropriately cited. Some minor errors in the referencing style. 7-10 high quality relevant peer reviewed journal articles are cited. inaccuratecitations and/or fabricated references and citations. information are provided.
Total mark= ?1 ×∑?? 8 ?=2
Related Link: Assignment Help